<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Instruments</title>
	<link>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/</link>
	<description>Human Code Generator</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-8048</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-8048</guid>
		<description>mono/.net on a cellphone would be nice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mono/.net on a cellphone would be nice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Oehlkers</title>
		<link>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7601</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Oehlkers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 05:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7601</guid>
		<description>Mr. Zac Bowling... I didnt know you had a blog! I mistakingly found your blog when searching for port forwarding information on 2wire routers. How are things going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Zac Bowling&#8230; I didnt know you had a blog! I mistakingly found your blog when searching for port forwarding information on 2wire routers. How are things going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sazu</title>
		<link>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7279</link>
		<dc:creator>sazu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7279</guid>
		<description>It would be real nice to see TI putting touch-screens to TI-92-like models... you know, kind of like in Nintendo DS. That kind of interface would be quite pop, and would be a bit less boring and more usable (if done carefully) than the current setup. Just a thought...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be real nice to see TI putting touch-screens to TI-92-like models&#8230; you know, kind of like in Nintendo DS. That kind of interface would be quite pop, and would be a bit less boring and more usable (if done carefully) than the current setup. Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zbowling</title>
		<link>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7180</link>
		<dc:creator>zbowling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7180</guid>
		<description>a lot is different. the menus and navigation are nearly the same as always, but then a lot of other things underneath are faster, better, and produce better graphics with the new screens. a bunch of new features have been added as well. the ti-8x models are the same and will always be the same just for compatablitly sake, but keep an eye out for the new line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot is different. the menus and navigation are nearly the same as always, but then a lot of other things underneath are faster, better, and produce better graphics with the new screens. a bunch of new features have been added as well. the ti-8x models are the same and will always be the same just for compatablitly sake, but keep an eye out for the new line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaya</title>
		<link>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7172</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zbowling.com/blog/2006/07/28/texas-instruments/#comment-7172</guid>
		<description>I'm unsure you can answer this, but has anything really changed in TI's calculators in the past 10 years?  I have a TI-92 10 years ago and it seems like their current top of the line is just a TI-92 with more ram/flash</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unsure you can answer this, but has anything really changed in TI&#8217;s calculators in the past 10 years?  I have a TI-92 10 years ago and it seems like their current top of the line is just a TI-92 with more ram/flash</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


