Comments on: UPnP IDG for Linux http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/ Human Code Generator Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:36:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: e8c7045bc242 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-26277 e8c7045bc242 Wed, 14 May 2008 20:01:21 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-26277 <strong>e8c7045bc242...</strong> e8c7045bc2428368b131... e8c7045bc242…

e8c7045bc2428368b131…

]]> By: debt collections http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-25947 debt collections Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:00:34 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-25947 <strong>debt collections...</strong> Neff:enveloping.twelve indelible ... debt collections…

Neff:enveloping.twelve indelible …

]]> By: Steffen http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-244 Steffen Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:35:47 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-244 The idg stuff is convinient, but what I really want is support for the UPnP A/V framework. A media server like Windows Media Connect but with transcoding capabilities. A number of media renderers - at least one for vide o and a simple audio renderer. And of course one control point integrated with the renderers and one that is stand alone for a pda or that new nokia web device. The idg stuff is convinient, but what I really want is support for the UPnP A/V framework. A media server like Windows Media Connect but with transcoding capabilities. A number of media renderers - at least one for vide o and a simple audio renderer. And of course one control point integrated with the renderers and one that is stand alone for a pda or that new nokia web device.

]]> By: Jeff Perrin http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-242 Jeff Perrin Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:22:17 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-242 <strong>MonoRail Looks Soooo Money</strong> MonoRail Looks Soooo Money

]]> By: Zenek http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-240 Zenek Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:57:14 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-240 Ugh, UPnP? It's propietary copy of ZeroConf, therefore it sucks. Ugh, UPnP? It’s propietary copy of ZeroConf, therefore it sucks.

]]> By: zbowling http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-245 zbowling Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:50:37 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-245 My research can help with that as well. Its really not to much different, but its supporting a really bad protocol even with IDG. Anyways, I shamefully own myself one of those microsoft a/v servers and have taken it apart, but I like the replayTV's better :-) My research can help with that as well. Its really not to much different, but its supporting a really bad protocol even with IDG. Anyways, I shamefully own myself one of those microsoft a/v servers and have taken it apart, but I like the replayTV’s better :-)

]]> By: zbowling http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-239 zbowling Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:27:05 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-239 Unfortunetly, no. I looked at Smoothwall Express a while back. Its a play on the old Intel generated code as well. The other part is that the client code can be far less sophisticated then the server side and reuse things like libxml and maybe parts of libsoup and such to get it done. It shouldn't be to difficult. Unfortunetly, no. I looked at Smoothwall Express a while back. Its a play on the old Intel generated code as well. The other part is that the client code can be far less sophisticated then the server side and reuse things like libxml and maybe parts of libsoup and such to get it done. It shouldn’t be to difficult.

]]> By: jba http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-238 jba Mon, 06 Jun 2005 05:50:03 +0000 http://zbowling.com/blog/2005/06/05/upnp-idg-for-linux/#comment-238 So you're the guy who tried to do that with gaim. Needless to say, I guess things didn't work out too well between you and the gaim folk. Anyhow, thought I should let you know what I tried to tell the gaim folk. Smoothwall Express, a GPL linux firewall/router already has UPnP capabilities. I figure UPnP should be symetrical enough that we can take the UPnP code from the server side (i.e. the firewall) and at least use library code on the client side? Would this help/accelerate you're effort? So you’re the guy who tried to do that with gaim.

Needless to say, I guess things didn’t work out too well between you and the gaim folk.

Anyhow, thought I should let you know what I tried to tell the gaim folk. Smoothwall Express, a GPL linux firewall/router already has UPnP capabilities.

I figure UPnP should be symetrical enough that we can take the UPnP code from the server side (i.e. the firewall) and at least use library code on the client side?

Would this help/accelerate you’re effort?

]]>